Персона:
Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна

Организационные подразделения

Организационная единица

Институт финансовых технологий и экономической безопасности

Институт финансовых технологий и экономической безопасности (ИФТЭБ) Национального исследовательского ядерного университета "МИФИ" готовит кадры в интересах национальной системы по противодействию легализации (отмыванию) доходов, полученных преступным путем, и финансированию терроризма (ПОД/ФТ). Междисциплинарность образования позволит выпускникам ИФТЭБ НИЯУ МИФИ легко адаптироваться на современном рынке труда и в бизнес-среде.

Фамилия

Когденко

Имя

Вера Геннадьевна

Полная страница элемента

Результаты поиска

Теперь показываю 1 - 10 из 21

Только метаданные
THE ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS IMPACT ON THE INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS OF NATURAL USERS COMPANIES
(2021) Kazakova, N.; Kogdenko, V. G.; Efremova, E.; Chikurova, S.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
Открытый доступ
Оценка уровня технологического развития компании: ключевые индикаторы
(НИЯУ МИФИ, 2025) Когденко, В. Г.; Винокурова, Т. К.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна; Винокурова, Татьяна Константиновна
Цель исследования – разработка методики оценки уровня технологического развития компании на основе ее консолидированной отчетности. Методика включает пять этапов – оценка предпосылок изменения технологического уровня, анализ интенсивности модернизации, анализ развития персонала, оценка инновационности, анализ результатов повышения технологического уровня. Методика апробирована на данных отчетности одной из крупнейших компаний химической отрасли России – ПАО Фосагро.
Только метаданные
Situational analysis of business activity of ferrous metallurgy companies from the perspective of an institutional approach
(2024) Kogdenko, V. G.; Kazakova, N. A.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
Только метаданные
Monitoring of the main parameters of environmental safety industrial production
(2021) Kazakova, N. A.; Kogdenko, V. G.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
© 2021 Izdatel'stvo Kalvis. All rights reserved.A critical analysis of the existing approaches to monitoring the main parameters of the environmental safety of industrial production is presented, a number of shortcomings are revealed associated with the limited compliance methods for assessing the compliance of environmental indicators with current standards, or the degree of information transparency of companies; the lack of consideration of the impact of dividend and investment policies of companies on the environmental safety of industrial production; lack of comparability of environmental performance in public reports. The scientific novelty of the proposed monitoring lies in the use of a systematic approach to the formation of the main parameters of environmental safety and the expansion of monitoring directions by including trends in the relationship between economic and environmental indicators calculated from the data of public reports of companies. The study was carried out on the example of the metallurgical industry in Russia, which made it possible to assess the representativeness of environmental reports and trends in the environmental safety of the industry.
Только метаданные
Methods of research of environmental risks of largest Russian companies of ferrous metallurgy
(2021) Kazakova, N. A.; Kogdenko, V. G.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
© 2021, Ore and Metals Publishing house. All rights reserved.The article is a continue research and determinates the second stage of assessing environmental risks of the largest Russian steel companies using public data. Based on the identified factors that have a significant impact on the level of environmental risks of ferrous metallurgy companies, the authors substantiated a indicators system, proposed a scale for their assessment, an algorithm for calculating and converting them into a point assessment, as well as the procedure for forming a consolidated rating of companies by the level of environmental risks. The developed methodology made possible to carry out a comparative analysis of the largest ferrous metallurgy companies by the level of environmental risks, taking into account the key factors of environmental impact (indicators of discharges, emissions, waste), environmental costs and investments in fixed assets. In addition, for calculating the consolidated rating, the information transparency of companies and the publicity of data on the impact of their activities on the environment were taken into account. According to the results of the study, the highest rating was received by JSC “NLMK”, the worst positions were taken by JSC “Mechel” and JSC “ChTPZ”. The advantage of the methodology is that it is entirely based on public information. It allows to assess the environmental impact absolute and specific indicators, to analyze these indicators’ trends, and also assess the effectiveness of costs for environmental protection, investments in the development and maintenance of production facilities from the point of view of reducing environmental risks. The study proved that environmental risk increases in companies with an unstable financial position, aggressive dividend policy, and insufficient investment in ensuring industrial safety. At the same time, the consolidated rating is comprehensively influenced by such factors as: Business scale and diversification; production specifics; the composition of the group of companies; the effectiveness of the technologies used in terms of environmental impact; environmental policy effectiveness in the field of reducing environmental impact; investments volume in environmental projects; the investment amount in fixed assets.
Только метаданные
Analysis of risk stability for different kinds of ferrous metallurgy companies in sanction conditions
(2024) Kogdenko, V. G.; Kazakova, N. A.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
Только метаданные
Assessment of Structural Changes in the Economy in Terms of the Priorities of Scientific and Technological Development in Russia
(2026) Kogdenko, V. G.; Kazakova, N. A.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
Только метаданные
Monitoring the development sustainability of metallurgical companies
(2022) Kogdenko, V. G.; Kazakova, N. A.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
The international situation and the sanctions policy have a negative impact on the stability of steel companies: critical risks are growing, primarily due to the closure of export routes that are strategically important for a number of companies (including because of sanctions on controlling beneficiaries) and the cessation of supplies of imported equipment, technologies and raw materials. Despite this, environmental safety should remain one of the key principles of the industry`s socio-economic development, which is proved by the public policy of most companies that declare their commitment to ESG principles. This paper presents a methodology for monitoring the stability of metallurgical companies, which allows to predict the situation in a timely manner, to prevent man-made accidents and environmental disasters, in order to justify for owners, management and investors the existence of an environmental safety risk and its criticality. Analysis of current industry trends and approbation of the methodology were carried out at four largest companies: Severstal, NLMK, MMK, EVRAZ. The scientific novelty of the methodology compared to studies focused on spatial economics lies in the application of the decoupling effect for metallurgical companies, i.e. at the micro level, as well as in the development of analytical tools that provide comprehensive diagnostics and assessment of environmental and economic parameters of companies' activities using integrated decoupling indices and the index of factors influencing it, which makes it possible to use it to justify managerial decisions on investments in environmental projects. In addition, the proposed tool, based on a risk factor approach to predict development sustainability of metallurgical companies, can be used as one of the areas for monitoring, diagnosing and controlling the activities of companies as part of the implementation of the developed Strategy for the development of the metallurgical industry for the period up to 2030. © 2022, Ore and Metals Publishing house. All rights reserved.
Только метаданные
MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND REPUTATIONAL RISKS OF BUILDING INDUSTRY COMPANIES
(2021) Kazakova, N.; Kogdenko, V.; Erokhina, E.; Sivkova, A.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
Только метаданные
Analysis of factors influencing the level of environmental risks of ferrous metallurgy companies
(2021) Kazakova, N. A.; Kogdenko, V. G.; Когденко, Вера Геннадьевна
© 2021, Ore and Metals Publishing house. All rights reserved.Environmental safety is one of the Russian metallurgical companies’ leadership key requirements in the world market, in which the environmental friendliness of goods and services production is one of the important competitive advantages. The study aimed to develop methodological approaches to assessing the environmental risks of the largest Russian ferrous metallurgy companies based on public data. The approach proposed by the authors includes the substantiation of an algorithm for assessing environmental risks from identifying factors that have a significant impact on the level of environmental risks of ferrous metallurgy companies, the choice of indicators-indicators and a scale for their assessment to the formation of a consolidated rating of companies and its interpretation. The methodological basis of the study was the regulatory documents on environmental safety; sustainable development standards in the field of ecology; rating agencies’ data and information; metallurgical companies’ information from the Internet resources, their financial, environmental and annual reports; analytical reviews, works of foreign and Russian scientists on environmental issues; security, monitoring data conducted by the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs. In assessing environmental risks, data from 9 ferrous metallurgy companies included in the Forbs rating of the largest private companies in Russia were used: PJSC“NLMK”, PJSC“Severstal”, PJSC“MMK”, “EVRAZ”Group, PJSC “Mechel”, “Metalloinvest” Group, “OMK” Group, PJSC “TMK”, PJSC “ChTPZ”. This article includes the results of the first stage of the study, which consists in identifying the characteristics of the compared companies that affect the level of environmental risks, which include: the organizational structure of the business (scale, geography of activities, structure of holdings), financial condition (availability of financial resources, their directions investments, primarily investments in the reconstruction of production facilities), as well as the availability of information to assess the company’s impact on the environment.